12 Ocak 2012 Perşembe

born leaders, born entrepreneurs

In “Born leaders, Born Entrepreneurs” Scott Shane brings in a very attractive and practice way a scientific work. As he has reviewed the scientific literature on how genes effects in the organizational behavior, and has brought this book full of interesting findings according to genetic.

At first, he gives a new answer to the traditional debate between nature or nurture. This time the nature- nurture debate moves toward nature, with the arguments that genes play a big role in one’s choice.

Researchers, Scott Shane says, have found "that over one-third of the difference between people on virtually every employment-related dimension investigated, including work interest, work values, job satisfaction, job choice, leadership turnover, job performance, and income, is genetic." That still leaves nearly two-thirds of the difference to be accounted for by environmental forces. A number of genes, particularly those that influence the production of neurotransmitters dopamine and serotonin, affect risk taking, responsiveness to stress, impulsivity, novelty seeking, and other attributions that affect the work life. So, we can conclude, genes account for a big portion of the difference and personality. And, as a consequence, genetic influences the difference among our work-related attitudes.

Our comfort with risk-taking, our scores on tests gauging management potential, our tendency to plan rather than act spontaneously—in each case, Mr. Shane says, inherited traits play a role. Heredity is even a factor in how much value we place on future income.

Mr. Shane notes that genes are not destiny, that the science is far from complete, and that he takes no position on the specific ways in which genetic information should be used by.

4 yorum:

  1. I totally agree with you that the science is far from complete. So we cannot be sure if what the author is saying is really true or not. Even more, blaming our genes for something that happens to us may be good excuse for some people when they do not want to take full responsibility for their actions. However, I also think that it is a good thing to know your genes somehow in order to understand the areas where you can succeed and so to concentrate your efforts towards those areas.

    YanıtlaSil
  2. including work interest, work values, job satisfaction, job choice, leadership turnover, job performance, and income, is genetic." That still leaves nearly two-thirds of the difference to be accounted for by environmental forces.I strogly agree with you because enviroment is more effective than the character.Even charecter is shaped by the enviroment.thanks.

    YanıtlaSil
  3. I agree with the statement of the author that you mentioned in the last part of the comment:that genes are not destiny, for example every persons that has a bad character he/she will blame the genes and they will not make improvement, or every person thinking that they have not the ability to succeed in their life due to the genes they stop to attempt any more to attain good results, so i can say that there is one more factor that affects the odds that something will occur. Nurture factor that reflects environmental side plays an important role in determining one persons character,career etc

    YanıtlaSil
  4. Good review from your point Ajkuna, but i couldn't understand your opinion in this case? Do you agree or not with the author message about the determinate gene?

    YanıtlaSil