This is kinda lets go crazy I think. Old school academics will not agree with Luke Williams about the general ideas of his theory layed out on this book. The approach is somehow as a derivate or a afterwards of the ``differentiate or die`` rule and it is goes further conducting that differentiating is not sufficient go further be a totally different unthinkable un seen example of something. Does it work properly?
We do know very well that ideas are developed in their time of living and their consistency is related to history. At this time being disruptive can be productive and evolving. The economic and social environment that we are living in is suitable to this nowadays. You always have to start with the word ``What if…`` That’s the key.
I dissagree with this facts because:
YanıtlaSilFirst always the conservator guy will never agree with that or this.
Second, One of the point tha you make succesful is the fact that you can take risks (if you start with "what if" you will never take the risk and realize your dreams.)
Right Ermelinda i agree with you. We know that higher risk higher return.
YanıtlaSilErald Kasa